[open-bibliography] More verbs. Electronic 'Items' (Yes, another FRBR thread)
rxs at talisplatform.com
Thu Jul 8 16:35:05 BST 2010
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Benjamin O'Steen <bosteen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Electronic Items
> Item doesn't make an awful lot of sense with regards electronics or
> born-digital items. I think that we might broaden the schema a little
> here to allow something like an OAI-ORE Aggregation here instead of an
> Item. Would it be preferable to subclass it as 'DigitalItem' or to use
> it unaltered?
Why not? Could you have multiple representations of the same
'manifestation' (PDF, jpeg, PS, HTML, etc.).
I mean, those are still completely analogous to 'item', aren't they?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the open-bibliography