[fc-uk-discuss] Re: [fc-uk-coord] [Fwd: New subscription request
to list fc-uk-coord from firstname.lastname@example.org]
timcowlishaw at gmail.com
Tue Apr 18 00:15:06 BST 2006
On 15 Apr 2006, at 07:27, MJ Ray wrote:
> For the benefit of discuss subscribers, I remind you it
> was suggested fc-uk "should refer [me] to article 5 of the
> constitution, and ask how [I intend] to fulfil the criteria
> for active membership". I don't consider that asking reasonably.
MJ, apologies for this. As you guessed, all I intended to do was to
ask what you were going to work on, but managed to word that in a
particularly snotty (and unclear) way. Sorry. The irony here is that
my main concern was to encourage action, rather than this sort of
procrastination over administrative nicities, and that appears to be
exactly what my ill-thought-out reply has done in this case. Oh well.
> I felt there were also some insults implied by the phrasing
> (maybe because I wasn't present at the London meetings), but I
> haven't directly addressed them, because maybe I misunderstood.
None intended at all, in my case at least.
More information about the fc-uk-discuss