[fc-uk-discuss] Response to the Guardian (was The BPI's Lates tClaims)

[Graham Seaman]

Tim Cowlishaw wrote:

>Good point.. have dropped the last two paragraphs. Are all the
>signatories happy with this?
>  
>

+1

Graham

>On 4/10/06, Crosbie Fitch <crosbie at cyberspaceengineers.org> wrote:
>  
>
>>>From: Tim Cowlishaw
>>>I am going to send the letter off at 1PM today, so get your signatures
>>>on there / any revisions suggested before that time! Does anyone have
>>>any thoughts in what could be edited out? at present the letter is
>>>probably too long for publication, and I'm having a hard time deciding
>>>what should go.
>>>      
>>>
>>Keep the main point that simply explains inconsistency along with the
>>evidence that supports it. Drop the evangelism/rant.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>fc-uk-discuss mailing list
>>fc-uk-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>>http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/fc-uk-discuss
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>fc-uk-discuss mailing list
>fc-uk-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/fc-uk-discuss
>  
>