[fc-uk-discuss] Response to the Guardian (was The BPI's Latest
Claims)
Tim Cowlishaw
timcowlishaw at gmail.com
Fri Apr 7 10:32:41 BST 2006
...and it's published in the guardian! wonderful!
thanks Rob!
will get a draft response up here by lunch time....
cheers!
tim
On 4/7/06, rob at robmyers.org <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Tim Cowlishaw <timcowlishaw at gmail.com>:
> > On 4/6/06, rob at robmyers.org < rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> This seems to ignore research that shows that heavy downloaders were
> also
> >> heavy
> >> buyers. On what basis are the BPI expecting otherwise?
> >>
> > Do you have a source for this research Rob? It'd be good to point it out
> in
> > any response...
>
> "Computer-literate music fans who illegally share tracks over the
> internet also
> spend four and a half times as much on digital music as those who do not,
> according to research published today."
>
> http://arts.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,11711,1536886,00.html
>
> :-)
>
> - Rob.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fc-uk-discuss mailing list
> fc-uk-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/fc-uk-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/fc-uk-discuss/attachments/20060407/9e6755d2/attachment.html
More information about the fc-uk-discuss
mailing list