[fc-uk-discuss] The BPI's Latest Claims

[Tim Cowlishaw]

I would also happily add my name to something like that. I may try and draft
a letter this lunch time and post to the list for signatories.


cheers,

Tim

On 4/6/06, Andy Williamson <bb at biguzzard.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 6 Apr 2006, at 10:09, rob at robmyers.org wrote:
>
> > The BPI's latest claims of losses are reported uncritically by the
> > Guardian:
>
> On 6/4/06 10:22, "David M. Berry" <d.berry at sussex.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > Where is the call to arms? What are we going to do about it? How can
> > I proactively stop this drip-drip pr campaign?
>
> By writing directly to the Guardian, providing an alternative view and
> asking them to justify their journalistic stance. Perhaps you're both
> doing
> this, as well as writing to this list. If so that's great. It seems to me,
> that The Guardian, more than most mainstream news outlets, is particularly
> sensitive to justifiable questioning of its editorial integrity - through
> its Readers' Editor.
>
> If someone here would like to put together a response to this article, I
> would be happy to consider adding my name as a signatory. Such a letter
> doesn't need to purport to represent the views of a (dis)organisation -
> just
> the list of individuals who sign it.
>
> Regards
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fc-uk-discuss mailing list
> fc-uk-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/fc-uk-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/fc-uk-discuss/attachments/20060406/8887e00f/attachment-0001.html