[ckan-discuss] CKAN for humans?
rufus.pollock at okfn.org
Wed Apr 27 14:11:04 BST 2011
On 27 April 2011 12:15, Christopher Gutteridge <cjg at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> Some time ago I sent quite a long list of suggestions you might use as a
> starting point, the key issue being to consider the poor sod who lands on a
> random CKAN package page, via google. -- they are not very hospitable to
> people who don't actively already understand CKAN.
> http://ckan.net/about put me right off.
Let's change it!
> Perhaps Refus still has my brain dump?
Here it is (forwarded by Jonathan):
On a positive note a fair number (though by no means all) of your
comments have been addressed :-) since last August!
More information about the ckan-discuss